Wednesday, November 30, 2005


CLOUDY
30 °
Humidity: 65 %
more weather



Keyword search
QwikNav

Archive search

Last 30 days search

Search




Home »   Opinion »   Op-Ed Columns » 


Article Tools:

Print

Email

Index

Help


Article published Saturday, August 20, 2005

SATURDAY ESSAY
A painful but necessary move from Gaza
Photo
Barry Leff is rabbi at Congregation B'nai Israel in Toledo.


EVERYWHERE you go in Israel today you see orange and blue ribbons streaming from car antennas and clothing, purse straps and backpacks.



Orange is for the large minority opposed to "the disengagement," the withdrawal of 8,000 Jewish settlers from Gaza Strip and West Bank. Blue is for the slight majority who favor it.

The passions involved, the harsh rhetoric, the demonstrations, all make our recent red state/blue state divisions seem tame. Those on Israel's political right, the ones opposed to the withdrawal, have been staging mass demonstrations for months.

A radical few have vandalized cars that display blue ribbons, blocked roads with their bodies, nails, or oil, and threatened violence. A group of right-wing rabbis even invoked a Kabbalistic curse on Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.

These emotions are aroused by the prospect of Jews being kicked out of their homes. Jews have reason to be especially sensitive about being evicted from their homes. Millions were displaced in Europe before and during World War II.

After the formation of Israel in 1948, 800,000 Jews were expelled from Arab countries. The most common bumper sticker of those opposed to the withdrawal says Yehudi lo m'garash Yehudi, "a Jew does not expel a Jew."

Coupled with the expulsion revulsion is a strong spiritual attachment to all of the land of Israel. Many settlers believe that giving up Gaza isn't only a bad idea - they believe it's a sin.

I recently had the opportunity to sit in the living room of a Jewish settler in Gaza Strip. Just the term "Jewish settler" conjures up an image of an Uzi-toting zealot with prayer fringes and a scruffy beard being dragged off a barren hilltop by Israeli police. The reality is very different.

Chagit is a 20-year resident of Gaza, a 40-something mother living in a lovely middle class home with a green yard. She's religious but not radical, concerned about her family, concerned about where they're going to live, concerned about how they'll earn a living when they leave Gaza, even concerned about where she's going to store all her stuff if she's forced from a 2,000-square-foot home into a 900-square-foot trailer.

Chagit, like most of the settlers, is not some wild-eyed crazy person, intent on evicting every Palestinian west of the Jordan River. But she does not believe sacrificing her home will lead to peace.

In addition to their emotional and religious attachments to the land, many settlers believe that their presence in Gaza enhances Israel's security.

Many settlers point to the war in 1948, when Jewish settlements in Gaza helped slow down the advance of Egyptian troops toward Tel Aviv. They claim that withdrawing from the settlements in Gaza will put Israeli cities closer to Palestinian rocket and mortar attacks.

So in the face of all this opposition, why is the Israeli government so intent on this withdrawal, and why does over half the population favor it?

Most Israelis, even in the left-wing peace camp, are pessimistic about the prospects that withdrawal will lead to peace. They know that Palestinian Prime Minister Abu Mazen's control over his own police forces, let alone over terrorist groups like Hamas and Islamic Jihad, is tenuous at best.

Many terrorists see the withdrawal as a victory for terror - and a reason to continue their attacks.

Israel is withdrawing from Gaza not because that will immediately lead to peace with the Palestinians but because the two-state solution is clearly in Israel's best interests. Israel's near-term goal, as retired Major General Uzi Dayan described it to me, is to have a Jewish democratic state with defensible borders.

By a "Jewish" state, most Israelis mean that in the way that America is a "Christian" country. (One-fifth of Israel's population is Muslim, with a small percentage of Christians, Druze, and other faiths). As in the United States, people of all creeds can worship as they choose without fear of persecution. They can vote, serve in the government, and enjoy equal civil rights.

The civil law code is not based on religious law. (Much of it, in fact, is based on British law.) But Israel does have a Jewish character: many stores are closed on the Jewish Sabbath, Saturday, and most national holidays are the religious holidays of the Jewish majority (just as Christmas is a federal holiday in the United States, and many states, including Ohio, have "blue laws" to protect the sanctity of the Christian Sabbath, Sunday.

Israel does not want to annex all of the West Bank and Gaza, because that would mean making another 3.5 million Muslims citizens, and that would mean the end of the Jewish character of the state.

The status quo, with Israel as an occupying power and the Palestinian people in a state-less limbo, is clearly untenable militarily, morally, and financially.

To have the scattered settlements of 8,000 Jews making Swiss cheese out of the map of Gaza, with its 1.4 million Arab residents, makes no sense militarily. It takes thousands of soldiers to protect the lives of those 8,000 Jews. It's much better for Israel to remove those citizens from harm's way and create a border with Gaza that can be more easily defended, as a step toward that two-state solution.

It's a real pity that Chagit and the other settlers can't stay in Gaza as residents of the Palestinian Authority. I spoke to some settlers who said they'd be happy to do so, but no one in either government has proposed that. The Palestinian Authority is unwilling to take responsibility for protecting Jews who remain behind, and lacks the practical ability to do so.

Someday, God willing, there will be real peace in the Middle East.

Jews from Jerusalem will gamble at the casino in Jericho, Palestine and won't need armed guards to pray at the Tomb of the Patriarchs in Hebron. Muslims from Gaza City will hang out in the malls in Tel Aviv and travel unimpeded to worship at the Dome of the Rock.

While we wait for that day, Israel is doing the only thing it can do unilaterally: establish defensible borders. It's a very difficult and painful move for Israel, but one that is necessary.

Barry Leff is rabbi at Congregation B'nai Israel in Toledo.


 RECENT RELATED ARTICLES

Local connections to Mideast keep eyes on Gaza pullout | 08/18/2005
Troops forcibly remove Gaza settlers; Israeli kills three Palestinians | 08/17/2005




READER FORUMS
Reader Topics and Debate.

 
© 2005 The Blade. By using this service, you accept the terms of our privacy statement and our visitor agreement. Please read them.
The Toledo Blade Company, 541 N. Superior St., Toledo, OH 43660 , (419) 724-6000
To contact a specific
department or an individual person, click here.
The Toledo Times ®